by Kerri Kokias, SCBWI-WWA Critique Coordinator
The Great Critique, coming up this Monday, January 7, is full!
With so many eager participants, it
seems timely to have a brief post on Critiquing 101.
The Job of the
Author/Illustrator is to introduce the work and then sit back and listen to feedback
without being defensive. It’s useful to take notes on everything, even if a
piece of feedback doesn’t initially resonate. Ask questions for
clarification. And later, decide which advice to take.
The Job of the
Critiquer is to encourage the author/illustrator to do their best work by pointing out
what works in a piece, as well as areas for development.
Specifics to
consider when critiquing manuscripts….
· Is the title effective? Does
it arouse interest and hint at content?
· Does the beginning grab
and hold attention? Does the story begin at the appropriate time?
· Is the point of view
consistent? Is it the most effective one?
·
Is the material
appropriate for the proposed audience?
·
Is the setting (time and
place) clear?
·
Is the theme fresh and important?
·
Does the story move with
good pacing and transitions?
·
Is the content focused?
Does it show, not tell? Are sensory details woven in?
·
Are characters interesting,
well-rounded, and believable?
·
Does the plot develop
with credibility? Are character’s motivations clear? Is there sufficient
conflict and growth?
· Is the voice fresh,
original, compelling and age appropriate?
·
Does the dialogue seem
natural? Does it show character and advance the story? Do individual characters
have a distinct way of talking?
· Is word choice
effective? Is there clarity, rhythm and power in the language?
·
Do chapter endings make
you want to read on? Does the end of the story leave you satisfied?
Specifics to
consider when critiquing illustrations:
·
Is the composition strong
and interesting?
·
Is the chosen medium the
best for the artist and subject?
·
Do the text and
illustration support AND supplement each other? (Does the work illustrate the
text and then contribute even more?)
·
Is there fluid movement
and rhythm in shape and line?
·
Is the point of view
effective? Does it vary to avoid monotony?
·
Does the layout contribute
to the text?
·
Are characters fully
developed? Consistent in appearance throughout?
·
Are the gutters free of
important information?
·
Are page breaks
effective?
·
Does the work break down
into the correct page specifications according to its form (picture book = 24,
32, 40, etc.)?
In summary,
critiquing is an essential part of making your work be the best that it can be!