Take a look at this
article from www.guardian.co.uk entitled "Are Books Dead, and Can Authors Survive?"
As Chris Anderson said in his book Free: Why $0.00 is the future of business: "Every industry that becomes Digital will eventually become free."
The reason why a living wage for writers is essential is that every industry that has become digital has seen a dramatic, and in many cases terminal, decrease in earnings for those who create "content". Writing has already begun its slide towards becoming something produced and consumed for free.
Visit the
Annoyed Librarian for an interesting take on this article, full of snark and wisdom.
Betteridge’s Law of Headlines usually gets confirmed with every instance of a question mark in a headline I see. The problem with this headline is that it has two questions. Are books dead? No! Can authors survive? Yes, at least depending on what you mean by an author.
Why couldn’t the Guardian just ask if authors were dead? No!
What do you think? The Guardian article does seem focused more on adult publishing--but could children's publishing be headed that way as well?